Scientists struggling to explain massive worldwide wildlife deaths

(Updated 10:15am CST January 7, 2011)

Image borrowed from the Daily UK

It started in Arkansas with 100,000 fish and 5,000 redwing blackbirds.  Then it was 500 more birds a few days later in Louisiana.  Several hundred show up in Kentucky.  Now new stories are surfacing from around the globe of birds and fish dying in droves.  A bunch of birds dead on a highway in Sweden.  100 tons of fish wash up on the coast of Brazil.  These occurances are ostensibly unrelated but they all have at least one thing in common - scientists don't have a freaking clue what the causes are and are pulling blatantly preposterous explanations out of their asses to quell the increasing alarm of the public. 

Our main theory is that the birds were scared away because of the fireworks and landed on the road, but couldn't fly away from the stress and were hit by a car.

Okay.  Right.  The fireworks scared them, but they all stood still for the car to hit them?  Sounds like a stretch, but not as ridiculous as the following explanation given on MSNBC.

It's probable that thousands of birds were asleep, roosting in a single tree, when a 'washing machine-type thunderstorm' sucked them up into the air, disoriented them, and even fatally soaked and chilled them.

Probable?  Excuse my non-professional blogger language, but come the f@#% on!  At what point does it become less damaging for scientists to admit they don't have a clue what's going on than to publicly postulate preposterous proposals posing as possible understanding of the predicament?  Was there even a thunderstorm in Arkansas on New Year's Eve?  Wouldn't that have already worked its way into the story?

Blackbirds have poor night vision and they were likely killed because they banged into houses, trees and each other in their fright.

Right.  They were scared and 5,000 of them hit stuff so hard they died?  Wouldn't some be only slightly injured?  Where are the 10,000 injured birds?  There are none?  So 5,000 are dead and the rest just flew away unharmed.  The truth here is that "authorities" just plain don't know what's going on, only they can't bring themselves to admit it.  So they have to say something.

I've heard theories from non-scientists that made more sense.  I'm not talking about the invisible UFO theory.  Not because I don't believe in invisible space ships, rather I don't think it's likely to have caused the fish deaths also.  Those things have been going into and out of our oceans for centuries without creating this sort of havoc.  Ask Columbus.  But I digress...

The theory I find most probable, obviously not proposed by self-respecting scientific minds, is that these localized deaths are due to use of HAARP or something like it.  Focused energy of a particular vibration reflected off part of the atmosphere. 

Why?  Buckle in, kids.  This might be where I lose you.  The ones I call The Owners - you may know them as the NWO, the Illuminati, the Bilderbergers, etc. - have had a plan forever to create a sense of dread surrounding events leading up to December 21,2012.  If they can scare the general public into a sense of some terrible end of days scenario that very public won't be open to learning the more glorious truths about this very unique period in our history.  These same people like to slip ideas and concepts into popular shows and movies to place them firmly in the collective conscious.  An event virtually identical to the blackbird die off was part of the plot of ABC's Flashforward, except in that show it was crows that died in droves mysteriously.

A more insidious possible explanation is The Owners are experimenting with frequencies to determine what species are effected at what frequency of the ray.  This is why only one type of bird dies; why 100,000 drum fish show up on the banks of a river but not smallmouth bass or bluegill. 

Just wait till they figure out what frequency kills off the humans.

The Vitter Truth About Obama

What we have here is...

By BEN EVANS, Associated Press Writer Ben Evans, Associated Press Writer – Tue Jul 13, 1:58 am ET


WASHINGTON – Republican Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana says he supports conservative organizations challenging President Barack Obama's citizenship in court.

Vitter, who is running for re-election, made the comments at a town hall-style event in Metairie, La., on Sunday when a constituent asked what he would do about what the questioner said was Obama's "refusal to produce a valid birth certificate."

Such claims about Obama's birth certificate have been discredited. But with the crowd applauding the question, Vitter responded that although he doesn't personally have legal standing to bring litigation, he supports "conservative legal organizations and others who would bring that to court," according to a video of the event.

Read full story

The Way I See It...
There's plenty to hammer our president on in the REAL world.  To look for faults, we don't need to pull in Tales From Bizarroworld. The groundswell populace who put Barack Obama in office is populated with individuals - like myself - who are wondering why we're still in Iraq.  We can't believe the truth is we've ramped up troop numbers (and death tolls) in Afghanistan.  A nearly complete lack of public leadership leading to a joke of a gift to the insurance and pharma industries called health care reform...and the mishandling of the worst environmental disaster in the history of Amurica.


Let's talk about THOSE things.  We could talk about Obama in relationship to the American economy, but we ALL know that situation was signed, sealed, and delivered by the Bush Administration.  I personally don't know that anything Barack Obama did would have made us better off at this stage in the game.  Sure, his leadership on Wall Street reform has been only a few ticks higher on the Leadershipometer, but he did not do this to you and your children's children.  That Guy You'd Like To Have A Beer With did.

But Senator David Vitter is a symptom of the poison being spilled by the most vocal and powerful forces in the GOP; nay, the entire right "side" of this one particular nation on Earth.  This is where we go when we see the part of "right" played by Glenn Becks, Sarah Palins, Rush Limbaughs, Dick Cheneys, Karl Roves, Ann Coutlers, and Billo the Clowns. The fact the birthers aren't just the people Tea Partiers call "wingnuts", but rather have a United States Senator from the high-profile Gulf Coast state of Louisiana publicly stroking them...THAT is many things, including, but not limited to pathetic, frightening, challenging, enlightening...and foretelling.

This is the Vitter Truth about Barack Obama.  This is the Vitter Truth about where we are as a civilization.  Our leaders don't care about truth.  They don't care about what's real.  They only care about winning.  And we let them do it.  Does David Vitter truly believe Barack Obama is not an American (God, it looks even more ridiculous in print)?  I can't believe that.  He's privy to too much as a U.S. Senator.  It's not like he's some unbalanced lowly congressman like Joe Wilson.  And if he doesn't believe what he's pushing, he's selling his followers snake oil.  Trouble is, they're buying it.

$20 says David Vitter wins re-election, even AFTER it's exposed that he's backing the birthers.  Any takers?