Showing posts with label U.S.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.S.. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Nukes shut down by UFO hits mainstream media

It only took mainstream media 8 months to report a UFO was on the scene when 50 ICBMs with nuclear warheads went inexplicably offline for hours.  Bear in mind, this is an event ufologists were aware of almost immediately.  We knew about it in October.  We know it's not the first time.  But for whatever reason, MSM is finally acknowledging the event and disseminating the news to the public at large. 

One has to wonder what makes it newsworthy now since the event occurred October 23, 2010.  I guess we should just be thankful that Reuters finally decided to cover the story.  Consider the implications when a mainstream newswire service delivers a story with the following tidbits:

Significantly, these same individuals report sightings by "numerous teams" of an enormous, cigar-shaped craft that maneuvered high above the missile field on the day of the disruption.
The confidential Air Force sources also report that their squadron commander has warned witnesses not to talk to journalists or researchers about "the things they may or may not have seen" in the sky and has threatened severe penalties for anyone violating security.
The witnesses said that they felt compelled to speak out about the reality of UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites and urged the U.S. government to finally reveal the facts to the American people.
"Countless official denials about the reality of the situation have been issued over the years but, sooner or later, this amazing story will break wide open. What we need now is a courageous government whistleblower to come forward with the facts, and some daring journalists willing to treat the story seriously and write about it."
Indeed.

Friday, December 17, 2010

America: Headed for an abrupt end?

History repeats itself.  We all know this axiom well, but how many of us believe it actually applies to our times, our lives, our country?  We know empires fall.  We know revolutions sweep societies.  But could it happen here in America?  And could it happen soon?

Recently I read a chapter on cyclology from the unpublished book The End of Our Century by Francois Masson, originally written in French and translated to English by David Michael Steinberg.  Though never actually published, it can be read for free on David Wilcock's site Divine Cosmos.  The book was written in 1979-80, and as the title connotes, it focuses on the end of the 20th century - now obviously in our past.  But while the overall work spotlights one particular moment in time, the chapter on cyclology is perhaps still pertinent today. 

What this section of the book postulates and subsequently supports with multitudinous examples is that history does literally repeat itself.  This is not a new idea.  Plato made the theory famous, giving the figure of 25,920 years to a complete cycle.  Incidentally, this corresponds to the amount of time the Earth cycles through the Great Year, or precession of equinoxes.  It might be interesting to note here that the Mayans knew about this 25,920 year cycle, too.  The calendar you've heard so much about is based on it.  Furthermore, you might be interested in knowing that the Hindus, the Bible, and the Zodiac all have cycles that are based on this number or a factor thereof. 

There are many cycles which have been used by various civilizations: the Manvantara and the Yuga of the ancient Hindus, the cycle of Daniel, the polar or ternary cycle and the Biblical cycle of seven times 77 years. But every one of these is found in the perfect number, 25920 years, by simple division or multiplication.

Here are the various basic cycles obtained by this method:

25920 / 2 = 12960. 12960 x 5 = 64800 years, the Manvantara cycle.

25920 / 10 = 2592 years. The Daniel cycle.

25920 / 6 = 4320 years or Yuga cycle in the tradition of India.

25920 / 12 = 2160 years, cycle of a civilization or a religion and corresponding to the precessional passage from one constellation of the Zodiac to the next.

25920 / 12 = 2160 and 2160 / 2 = 1080 years, cycle of opposition to what was created at the start of the 2160-year cycle.

2160 / 3 = 720 years, so-called polar phase or ternary division pointed out by Rev. Father Poucel.
Being French, Masson applies his cyclical analysis to French history, which may not be very exciting for classically French-hating Americans (although the ties and similarities between the French and Russian revolutions are intriguing!).  Perhaps I might be able to grab a little more of your attention if I told you that by using his system he predicted the fall of the Soviet Union a full decade before it happened. 

Around the first of March 1990, coup d'etat in the non-European part of the USSR, putting an end to the Bolshevik revolution. Inauguration of a new regime January 1991?

Remember, that's a prediction he made circa 1980!  Who would have thought then that the USSR would become week, let alone completely dissolve?  The official date is Christmas Day, 1991 - the same year Masson predicted. 

But he also connects the history - and downfall - of Rome with that of America.  That's right.  Hits a little closer to home and now you're interested, right?

His analysis is detailed and extensive.  I'll save you the minutia and hit you with the hilights:

To show the importance of numbers, we will take for example the US, which Michel Helmer and many other observers consider the new Rome: the same spirit of enterprise, the same general morality, the same kind of laws as republican Rome.

There's a detailed comparison between Roman leaders and Nixon and Carter.

In 187 B.C., Scipio Africanus, who defeated Antiochus, was being tried, and:


2160 years later in 1973 it was the Watergate scandal that forced Nixon, who had honorably terminated the Vietnam War, to resign and retire to his estate, just as Scipio had done 2160 years earlier.

In 184 B.C. the famous Cato, called the Censor, was elected, and 2160 years later, in 1976. J. Carter was elected.

For the sake of comparison, let us review Cato's life: he came from a family of plebeian farmers and always remained a rustic. Upon his father's death Cato quit the armed forces and cultivated his land, as did Carter.


Cato came up through the ranks from private to military Tribune and served in the Roman wars. In 198 B.C. he was elected plebeian edile and proved merciless toward usurers [sic] when he was governor of Sardinia.
The life and acts of J. Carter so far strongly resemble that archetype. He is first and foremost a man of the soil. He was a sailor and Navy officer, a follower and disciple of Admiral Rickover when the latter pushed through the launching of atomic submarines, a practically absolute weapon which led to a long American supremacy.
To return to the future: Cato, during his government, his "censorship," tried to bring Rome back to the pristine morality of the first Romans, in opposition to the moral laxity of Hellenistic culture.

To this end Cato issued several decrees on the economy and life style of the Romans and a famous decree on women's luxuries.


Carter, 2160 years later, follows the same route with his economic measures on big cars and their excessive consumption, and his famous remark about the underwear of the western settlers to combat the cold.

I suspect you get the point.  Francois Masson was able to look at the history of Rome and see a cyclical relationship between events in antiquity and corresponding events in what were relatively current American events.
This reminds me of another euphemism:  Rome didn't fall in a day.

Enter Pulitzer-winner and former New York Times war correspondent Chris Hedges, who watched the fall or the Soviet Union firsthand.  In an exclusive interview with Raw Story today, Hedges unleashes a dire prediction:  The U.S. empire could collapse at any time.

Speaking to Raw Story on Wednesday night, he said the signs of US collapse are plain to see and compared the country's course through Afghanistan to Soviet Russia's.

"We're losing [the war in Afghanistan] in the same way the Red Army lost it," he said. "It's exactly the same configuration where we sort of control the urban centers where 20 percent of the population lives. The rest of the country where 80 percent of the Afghans live is either in the hands of the Taliban or disputed."

Hedges was one of roughly 135 activists who participated in an act of civil disobedience that resulted in their arrests outside the White House yesterday, even as Obama was unveiling a new report on progress of the war in Afghanistan.

Hedges said he attended the protest and planned to get arrested because he is against the corporate powers that have enveloped the nation. "We've undergone a corporate coup d'état in slow motion," he said.

America's military and economic empire could collapse at any time, but predicting the precise day, week or month of its potential demise is unattainable.

"The when and how is very dangerous to predict because there's always some factor that blindsides you that you didn't expect. It doesn't look good. But exactly how it plays out and when it plays out, having covered disintegrating societies, it's impossible to tell."
And if America falls, what are the chances she would go by herself?  The civilized world is on the brink of economic collapse.  The future looks precarious even just based on what we regular folk get to see from the bottom of the planetary pyramid scheme.  Who knows what's really going on at the top.  From the news being leaked and trickled down by insiders, there's a literal war going on that's far from the headlines. 

In closing, I'd recommend you try to read the headlines of the day through a new prism.  Not that you can do anything to stop it if it's coming - but at least you won't be surprised.  Keep your eye on anything to do with currency, unrest, and China. 

I'm not saying I believe America is going to end soon.  I'm just noticing that other people are.  After all, as we all know, history repeats itself.

Friday, June 4, 2010

Walking on Sunshine

Continuing the trend of good environmental news stories today, here's one about an invention from the UK.  24-year-old Laurence Kemball-Cook has created Pavegen, a walking surface that gathers some of the kinetic energy released by a person's footsteps and transfers it to a battery to be used for attached lighting.

Now, I know you may be thinking, "So what?" or "big deal".  If so, I would ask you to imagine all the other applications and what-ifs.  For instance, what if this technology were employed on a large scale - say the entire network of New York City sidewalks?  And instead of storing the energy hyper-locally, what if it were harvested through a network and added to the entire energy grid, thereby reducing need for other energy sources in blanket fashion?  What if stadiums used it on their walkways, stairs, and even in seated areas.  Stadium lights could actually flash noticeably brighter with every "We will rock you" boom-boom-clap.

Or what-if the floor of every new house built in the world sent this energy to a power station in the home?

Leave it to the young to save our collective global ass.  God bless 'em.  Unfortunately, innovation and ingenuity of this sort is at best not encouraged and at worst flat-out discouraged in the United States, where it used to be our proudest export.  Unless we can match and surpass the world-changing thinking of other industrialized countries, we will continue our descent into obsolescence.  And maybe that's best for the world since the only exports we're known for lately are war machinery and counterproductive fear-based isolationism. 

Here's the biggest what-if:  What if instead of throwing untold trillion$ at private (read corporate) defense contractors in the military-industrial complex to find a better way to kill the brown people of the planet, we divert ALL the money to enhancing and perfecting technologies like this one to harvest as much energy as possible from 100% clean sources? 

If we can imagine it, we can do it.

Imagination is more important than knowledge.
-Albert Einstein

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Compromising the Compromised Compromise

So there's a Democrat in the White House and both houses of Congress have Democratic majorities. Right? I could SWEAR that's where things stood last time I checked. So why do these people continue to whittle down health care reform?

Health care costs too much. Businesses can't afford to provide it for their employees. State governments are having a hard time providing it to their employees. Stand alone citizens are having a difficult time providing it for themselves. The people who can't afford it, just don't have it and have to hope they don't need it. Ever.

But the companies in the health care game are raking it in.

In my view, health care should not be a business. There should not be a health care "market". As a species, I feel we owe it to ourselves to provide for ourselves the best care for the health and survival of the body so that we can experience life. I think we should make it a human RIGHT.

Easiest way to do that? Single payer system. We pay taxes, taxes pay for health care. For ALL. Just because.

But of course the real world requires a compromise. Enter the Public Option. Compromise #1. Allow citizens to opt in to a government-run option to compete with insurance companies to help bring the cost of health care down. Because THAT's the problem, you'll remember. It looked like we were going to get the public option when the reform package left the House of Representatives.

But it got scrapped in the Senate. Apparently The Club thought it would be too popular and successful and their Owners would lose too much money. They say it's an unwanted intrusion into the health care system. Unwanted by whom? If it's unwanted, it won't get used and is therefor not a problem. The problem is it IS wanted! A Survey USA poll shows up to 77% of Americans WANT THE PUBLIC OPTION!

So they decided instead of a public option, they'd at least open up Medicare to younger citizens and help cover a FEW more people than today. Not even close to substantial reform, but it's something. Compromise #2.

But TODAY there's talk that Dems are scrapping THAT, too! They're apparently afraid they won't get the package passed before Christmas. They're more worried about getting it done before an arguably arbitrary date than they are giving the American people what they want and deserve! Compromise #3.

So I'm confused. After this, where is the reform in health care reform? What's going to substantially change, at all, let alone reduce the cost of providing health care to companies and individuals in this supposed greatest nation on the planet with the supposedly best health care system?

There's no reform left. It's all been compromised away by a bunch of frightened little schmucks who have the power to do real good for the people of this country but are too scared of how it hurts their shot at reelection. Or perhaps they're worried about losing the GREAT HEALTH CARE that comes with being a legislator at the federal level?!

Where is there an incumbent (after all, they're ALL incumbents) who will put the good of her/his constituency above their personal political ambitions? One could say it's incumbent upon them.

I swear if substantial health care isn't passed because this group of bastards sold us all out, I will be a VERY loud voice for firing every one of them. Every last one, regardless of party - because as you know the American Deviant is an independent voter. Emphasis on voter.

They're failing us.