Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts

Monday, March 11, 2013

Episode 2, Proof Life is "Out There"


I stumbled across some very cool truth and couldn't resist taking the opportunity to share it with you in an impromptu podcast! Below are links to some of the news items referenced in this episode.




Thursday, June 7, 2012

ExoUniversity with Alfred Webre | Extraordinary Year June 6, 2012

Time travel, teleportation to secret bases on Mars and the moon, psi sciences, and more!

Alfred Webre joins us to reveal his latest endeavor: ExoUniversity.org and how anyone can now take classes and learn about the truly deep reality we all share.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Monday, March 26, 2012

Please remember to THINK responsibly

Okay, here's the deal, people:  Physical reality coalesces around our thoughts. I want you to re-read the previous sentence, then stop and really let the concept sink in to your understanding.   Spiritual traditions have taught this for eons.  Edgar Cayce repeatedly said, "Mind is the builder."  This is not a figurative statement!  We know prayer works.  We know the more people focused on an outcome increases the chance of that outcome.  How do you suppose that is?  Physics researchers are beginning to understand not only THAT this is true, but HOW it works.

Furthermore, the force by which this operates doesn't seem to distinguish between what you DO want and what you DON'T.  It only knows what you ARE thinking, and that's what "becomes".  Your thoughts simply add energy to what will manifest in our physical reality.  If you spend a lot of time and energy focused on things that bring you pain - or fear - or sadness, then that's what you help build for the future.  In other words, the Universe doesn't understand "NOT".  It doesn't "get" that you don't want war when you're thinking about it all the time.  You're thinking about war, so you get more war.

So, with this in mind don't you suppose it's against your own best interest to put intense thought and emotion into anything you don't want?  Wouldn't it be wiser to place your mental focus on what you'd like to see become reality?  Having trouble paying the bills?  Ask yourself how often you think about not being able to pay the bills.  What if you thought about getting money or opportunities to make money, instead?  What if you imagined what world peace would really be like, and felt the strong emotions of relief, hope, positive excitement and giddiness?

Also, remember this reality is shared.  You are not alone here on Planet Earth.  What you manifest into reality with your thoughts often affects others.  Therefor, you have a deep, deep responsibility to all life on this planet to use your power of thought for the good of all.  Conversely, you have a duty to consciously derail thoughts of events and conditions you don't believe are beneficial to the greater good!

Look, you probably never realized you had such power.  It's okay, we've all been conditioned to believe our thoughts are contained within the gray matter in our skulls.  The people who would have us believe that are the same folks who constantly pepper our waking lives with negativity via "the news".  The important thing now - right now - is that you incorporate this understanding into your entire approach to life.  Think about what you want, not what you don't.  Think about what you want to have, not what you don't have enough of.  Think about what you want to experience, not what you're afraid will happen.  Worrying is like praying for what you don't want!

So please, remember to think responsibly.

I leave you with a quote attributed to the late Mother Teresa.
"I was once asked why I don't participate in anti-war demonstrations. I said that I will never do that, but as soon as you have a pro-peace rally, I'll be there."

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Mass animal deaths continue, and so do scientists' stupid explanations

Maybe they should just stick with "these things happen all the time."  It's obviously untrue to the observant citizen, but at least it's better than "they ate too much." 

If you're reading this, no doubt you're all-too familiar with the spate of mass animal deaths that has plagued Earth the past couple weeks.  Birds, fish, crabs, and turtles.  The latest stories are thousands of fish in the Chicago area, 100 dead birds in California, and hundreds of turtle doves in Italy. 

Scientists' explanations?  In the case of the fish in Chicago, Lake Michigan Program biologist Dan Makauskas says the cold killed them.  Very similar to the "this stuff happens all the time" pat answer.  But if this stuff indeed happens all the time, why don't I recall any stories from the Chicago area of this sort of thing happening before?  I don't live there, but I think it would be a national news story if and when it happened.  Maybe not every time, but since it happens "all the time" one would think it would make a newscast or headline once in a while.  Maybe I'm wrong.  Maybe this sort of thing does happen in Lake Michigan frequently.  I'd LOVE for someone to show me it has and does.  Until then, I'm sticking with my opinion that something larger and unique is going on here.

As for the 700 dead Italian turtle doves, experts are seriously proposing that you believe they ate too much.  700 birds all ate too much and died together. That's their explanation.  And they continue to expect you to respect them and their word.

But we're not a planet of idiots.  Something stinks here, and we would appreciate if those who called themselves our authorities actually got to work on determining what it is and spent a lot less time trying to give us crap explanations that are ridiculous at face value.  Unfortunately for these "authorities", we are not as stupid as their answers.

It would honestly be better for these people to just admit they don't know any better than we do.

Friday, January 7, 2011

Psych journal covers ESP study, outraging eggheads

The subhead to this blog post should be, "This is what disclosure looks like."  Whether it's NASA admitting that there are hundreds of thousands of planets like Earth just within our galaxy or scientific journals finally admitting there is something to ESP, tidbits of truth are trickling out of the establishment to change the public's perception of reality.  The real shame is that said public needs to hear these things from "authorities" before they can accept what's been before us our entire lives.

The New York Times published yesterday a story about how The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology is publishing the now well-reported research from Cornell Professor Daryl J. Bem proving prescience is a real and scientifically measurable thing, and it's got establishment eggheads in a frothy fury! 
“It’s craziness, pure craziness. I can’t believe a major journal is allowing this work in,” Ray Hyman, an emeritus professor of psychology at the University Oregon and longtime critic of ESP research, said. “I think it’s just an embarrassment for the entire field.”
Crazy?  Why?  The research has now been peer reviewed and found to meet the standards for inclusion in a respected psych journal.  That means the science is good.

It seems that the real problem scientists like Hyman have is not that ESP has finally been scientifically proven as a real phenomenon, but that they don't have any way to scientifically understand how it works!
All four [reviewers] decided that the paper met the journal’s editorial standards, Dr. Judd added, even though “there was no mechanism by which we could understand the results.” [emphasis added]

This is the problem with relying on scientific authorities to explain reality to us.  If they can't use the scientific method to explain a phenomenon - even when they can prove the phenomenon is real - they insist on ignoring it and they get upset at the thought of anyone taking the phenomenon seriously without the consent of their jealously protected authority.  The real bitch of it is once science advances far enough to determine how ESP works, people like Hyman will finally admit it's been real all along.  Not real before they understand, real all along once they do.

Hey, scientists:  Get over yourselves!

There are more things, Horatio, between heaven and earth than your scientists can explain to you.  That does not make them any less "real".  I would implore the reader to take scientific understandings into account but by no means limit yourself or your understanding of the cosmos to what science has put together.  Anyone who would deny the existence of something simply because they can't see, touch, hear, taste or otherwise measure it is not worthy of being called an authority.

Science is important for us to understand reality, but it is by no means the only way. 

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Alan Boyle needs to "get real"

I will readily and publicly admit I am enthralled and probably clinically obsessed with the recent increase in UFO phenomena. Now before you pull an Alan Boyle and automatically dismiss and discredit me, read on and hear me out.

Yesterday Boyle wrote a piece for MSNBC cautioning against making a connection between anything going on in the world and visitors from any place other than present day Earth. The title says it all: Year of the UFO? Let's get real.

Here is a classic case of disinformation and propaganda. Well done, Boyle.

You tied the fringe theory that recent wildlife deaths are caused by UFOs to the entire UFO community.  Interesting that you decided not to include the 100 tons of fish that washed up on the coast of Brazil within the past few days. Too large an anomaly for ya? Had to ignore it?  It's also interesting that he chose to ignore the even crazier explanations from actual scientists. 

I'm certainly not saying any of these wildlife deaths had anything to do with extraterrestrials. I don't believe they do.  But if you expect me to believe these things "just happen" every few years you need to find another nube to try that ploy on.

Speaking of ploys, the whole ridicule-the-messenger, herein represented by the suggestively cohesive "UFO community", is a lame and close-minded tactic. Don't you think? Where'd you pick that up, Boyle - Karl Rove's Political Redirection 101 at Beck University?

How about you do a Google search for UFO for each of the past ten years and see if there's any sort of trend to the numbers? What's your tactic for explaining away the exponential increase in sightings and subsequent stories?

The fact is, if Alan Boyle wants to get real he needs to admit there is something going on.  Sightings have shot through the roof.  Similar sightings of similar craft.  True, some of them might be man made by black ops budgets, but they wouldn't have the technology without reverse engineering of ACTUAL etraterrestrial craft.  Which means they had access to extraterrestrial craft.  Which means at least some of the sightings are authentic.  THAT'S what one needs to acknowledge if one is to "get real".

So why try to spread further ridicule of those who would publicly acknowledge something is going on and it effects everyone one of us?  What's the incentive?  Is it not curious that the source of this ridicule is a member of the establishment media who is also a supposed scientist.  Alan Boyle is obviously a tool. Question is, whose tool?

Friday, August 27, 2010

Letting Go of Fear

I spent last weekend learning about David Wilcock and watching videos of lectures he's given. To say the information I found changed my perspective on reality would be an understatement. In effect, it eliminated most of the fear I had concerning what's happening on our planet, what's happening to us as a species, and what could occur on December 21, 2012. That's a LOT! A lot of fear to release. A lot of change in perspective.

This has had a remarkable effect on my blogging. Essentially, I've found almost nothing worth posting.  I have no warnings.  I'm not afraid of The NWO Powers That Were or their plans for world domination.  I'm not even afraid of global cataclysm.  And without fear, I haven't been driven to keep a watchful eye on the underground news, so I'm not really aware of what things have been happening that I would previously have been compelled to repost, expound upon, or otherwise warn my fellow man about. 

It.  Doesn't.  Matter.

Why not?  Because we're in the end game, my friends.  There's an overwhelming amount of evidence to the fact that not only WILL something go down on the winter solstice of 2012, but that it's way bigger than you or me or politics or any human intention.  ANY human intention.  It's way bigger than our solar system.  It's God-sized.  It's a provable galactic energy-based spiritual phenomenon that cannot be stopped.  It can only be enhanced through our choices and awareness at that coming moment. 

Now, maybe you're thinking, "Wow, Tim.  You've really gone off the deep end this time, brother.  You've said some loony shit in the past, but I can't believe you're buying into some Mayan prophesy from 6,000 years ago."

Well, I am - and I'm not.  It's not about Mayan prophecies, not really.  It's about the convergence of so many things that to ignore it would be equivalent to the proverbial ostrich sticking its head in the sand.  "I can't see it, so it's not there!"  Only it is. 

Convergence of what?  A convergence of spiritual teachings millenia and worlds apart.  A convergence of poorly kept mystical teachings by elite secret societies who would keep the masses in the dark for their own gain.  A convergence of channeled information from a multitude of sources in a multitude of languages.  A convergence of sudden, recent, real, measurable solar change.  A convergence of breakthrough scientific understanding about the nature of physical reality on a quantum, energetic level - as well as new understanding about the nature and relationship of time and space and how, where, and why subatomic particles go when they disappear from observable material reality.  A convergence of energy streaming at our planet and species from the center of our galaxy that cannot be stopped, deflected, or avoided - not that we should wish to. 

Now, much of this I already knew - at least in part.  I'm a seeker of truth and my whole adult life has been spent trying to figure out how everything fits together.  But David Wilcock has done a MUCH better job of dedicating himself to that very task and has done a MUCH better job of putting the puzzle pieces together.

All I needed were a couple of pieces to click...and my understanding of the nature of reality increased tenfold in a day.  I am so encouraged by this new understanding that my fear has just dissipated. 

I realize that this post probably seems very vague to readers.  I can't accomplish much in the way of specifics right now because I'm just so overwhelmed by the Big Picture. 

In closing, I will predict that my blogging is going to change dramatically going forward.  I will still find plenty to say, but it won't be fear-based.  I will still post arguments for changing our society for the good of the many, even at the expense of the few.  I will still shine a light on the lies men tell themselves and each other.  I will still work to expose the truth of what happened on 9/11 so people will realize how all major world events have been orchestrated by people other than the ones being blamed.

But most of all, I will work to elucidate information my sisters and brothers haven't received, whether it's because some would like to keep the news suppressed or simply because they haven't had it communicated effectively yet. 

I would encourage you to take a moment now to subscribe to email updates using the form at the upper right of this page.  It's easy, and I promise to bring you information that is more valuable than money.  It will straight up change your life and how you see the world!

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Children with Lesbian Parents Are Better, Smarter, Faster

Okay, maybe not "better".  That's so...subjective.  Faster?  Yeah, I just threw that in to complete the Bionic Man euphemism.  To my knowledge, there's no evidence to support the claim (but that doesn't mean it's not true!)

But smarter?  To steal a line from Sarah from Wasilla, "You betcha!" *wink*

According to a study,
children in lesbian homes scored higher than kids in straight families on some psychological measures of self-esteem and confidence, did better academically and were less likely to have behavioral problems, such as rule-breaking and aggression.

Come to think of it, fewer behavioral problems might count as making these kids "better".  That's qualitative evidence, right? 

Now, we just need to do a study pitting these kids against kids from straight families.  I'm guessing that if they're psychologically sturdier as a group than their hetero-raised counterparts, they'll be less prone to depression and it's horrible symptom of eating for comfort and therefor be less apt to be overweight.  Hypothetically, they'd win more foot races.  That'd be the Bionic Trifecta!

And so much for the complete unraveling of society at the hands of homos.  Not that government is going to listen to SCIENCE when making policy decisions, but it sure sounds to me as if this is a good argument in favor of gay marriage.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Particulates Matter - Smoking Bans Render Proof of Secondhand Smoke Danger

If you've been on the fence about whether secondhand smoke is really all that dangerous, even to nonsmokers, your feet are about to touch down on the side of "DUH!"

CNN.com posted a story Tuesday on a correlation between communities that have enacted smoking bans and a decrease in heart attacks. The results are pulled from two large studies looking at communities both in North America and Europe, and the results are HUGE!

After just one year under the public smoking ban, cities experienced an average 17% decline in heart attacks. The LOWEST decline was 15%! That's after one measley year. After three years the average decline in heart attacks was 26%, with some places experiencing up to a 36% reduction.

This is grade school math, kids.

NO PUBLIC SMOKING = UP TO 1 in 3 HEART ATTACKS NEVER HAPPENS

Something else that can be deduced from this data: You parents who claim to love your children need to stop smoking around them YESTERDAY! This is all the proof you need to confirm secondhand smoke kills. 'Cause guess what else those studies learned: Those who benefitted most from smoking bans - women, nonsmokers, and young people.

"How harmful is secondhand smoke? Nonsmokers have a 25 percent to 30 percent higher risk of heart attack if they inhale smoke at home or at work, and smoke has been shown to affect heart health within minutes," says Dr. David Meyers of the University of Kansas School of Medicine.

"We can measure chemical changes within 20 minutes," he says. "The changes that occur primarily involve the clotting system. Basically, exposure to smoke makes your blood sticky and real clot-y and that's what causes heart attacks."


How do those chemicals get into the body? Not just by inhalation! Smoke is made up of tiny little particles. Those particles stick to every surface with which they come in contact. Smoke in your car, get it all over everything. Smoke in your house, get it all over everything. If you can smell it, it's there. Someone comes along and touches anything and WHAM! Heart attack risk just went up by a double-digit percentage.

It's fucking science.

So pull your damn head out of your ass and stop pretending you care about anyone other than yourself if you think you have the right to smoke around anyone or anything someone else might come into contact with. Because you don't.

It's your karma, bitches. Smoke at your own risk. And everyone else's.